Archive for July 6th, 2008

Review: MyVu Crystal

Sunday, July 6th, 2008 96 views

This is my third review of a MyVu video eyewear product. In April of this year, I reviewed the MyVu Solo Plus, and in May, I reviewed the MyVu Shades 301. Both of those products sold at a $199.95 price point and received favourable 4-star reviews. The product that I am reviewing this time is the MyVu Crystal, the top of the MyVu line coming in at a $299.95 price point. Since it has been several months since I outlined the basic features of MyVu eyewear, and there has been significant improvements in this model, I will go over them again and note changes where appropriate. MyVu kindly provided a review loaner for this review along with an iPod nano. I tested the product on both my own iPod touch and the loaner iPod nano so all of my observations are limited to those two video players.

The product comes very nicely packaged and includes a pair of glasses with attached earbuds carrying pouch; power, picture, and volume control dongle and charging cable. The previous models did not include volume control on the dongle so now most aspects of the viewing experience can be controlled without having to reach for the iPod. The picture controls remain disappointing as they offer only three different “steps” for colour and contrast. The finish and quality of the unit are flattering and have undergone design changes from the previously reviewed models which are an improvement from the previous “Cylon” look to a more traditional eyeglass look. Additionally, a magnetic clip has been added so that the cables can be clasped behind the head which I found to be helpful in avoiding awkward tangles. There are two colour options: amber and black. The black version was provided for my review which I found to be attractive, and judging only by images of the amber version, I think I would prefer the black look as the sleeker of the two. As before, the product comes with several sizes of earbuds, but instead of various nose clip sizes, the attached nose clip is malleable to customize fit. In both of my prior reviews I had complained that the nose clip definitely needed more padding, but I am glad to report that this model is much more comfortable so that is no longer a negative.

There are two versions of this product: the “Made for iPod” edition which is compatible with the video nano, touch, classic, and 5th generation video iPods, and the “Universal Edition” which is compatible with most portable video devices with video out. The FAQ page states: “Myvu has not yet been certified “Works With iPhone”. However, Myvu “Made for iPod” versions, like many iPod accessories, will work well with the iPhone when the iPhone is set to Airplane mode.” The glasses are lightweight and fold compactly into its carrying pouch which is a good feature for travel. The battery will last for about two movies (four hours) with a fully charged unit and iPod. The included documentation consisted of a four-step quick start guide which was slickly produced and easy to follow. A full user manual can be found at the vendor’s website. The deficiency I noted in the prior quick start guides has been corrected in this version, i.e. it explicitly states that the unit must be individually charged and does not draw power from the iPod. Also, I have noticed a marked improvement since my first review in the professionalism of the vendor and in the quality of its website.

Like the other models, there is full visibility above and below the low profile glasses; however, the Crystal also has semi-transparent “panels” to the left and right of the viewing screen so that there is peripheral visibility as well. Personally, I did not like this addition as the glow from the viewing image seemed to reflect off on both sides creating an undesirable mirror effect. This might be a matter of personal preference in a trade-off between peripheral visibility and a less distracting viewing experience. I experimented with the unit by placing black electrical tape over those side panels which greatly improved my viewing experience. If I purchased a pair, I would cover those panels permanently as I find the over and under visibility more than adequate. On its website, MyVu has an “Experience” page which has some pretty clever and accurate video simulations of the viewing experience including the peripheral semi-transparency. Though I did not find this stated on the MyVu site itself, another reviewer noted that the amber version of the Crystal allows more peripheral light than the black version. If that is indeed true, I would definitely recommend the black unit as my experience would lead to the conclusion that even more peripheral light would not be desirable.

The unit is advertised to be viewable in full light, but as before, I did not find that to be accurate in my experience. However, adding a visor or brimmed hat did greatly improve the viewing quality. In my use, the ideal viewing situation was in a semi-dark enviroment or at least out of direct lighting. The viewing experience consists of a floating image with the illusion of a 27-inch screen viewed at about eight feet distance. The sound quality was also improved in comparison with the prior products. The vendor identifies the earbuds as “from Ultimate Ears® for enhanced comfort, extended bass, and sound isolation.” In my experience with the prior models, most videos can be viewed in letterbox or full screen mode, though the instructions do not explain how. I discovered this by playing with the video settings on my touch. If video mode is set to “widescreen - off,” it will letterbox the image, and if it is set to “widescreen - on,” the image will fill the whole screen. However, on this model, it did not appear that there was any way to achieve the letterbox effect, but this may be due to my choice of videos, and some other media may behave as described above.

The $100 higher price point is primarily due to the tremendous increase in video quality in comparison to the less expensive units. Instead of a quarter VGA resolution (320X240), the Crystal boasts full VGA resolution (640X480). I was completely pleased with the viewing quality which lacked the graininess in the prior models with my only complaint being the lack of fine-tuning for contrast and colour as mentioned above. MyVu also states that the field of view is 33% wider than other models.

Pros:

  • High quality video with full VGA resolution (640480)
  • Easy access to volume and picture controls on dongle
  • More attractive design
  • Perfect for use at the gym and during long commutes
  • Lightweight and portable (under 3 ounces)

Cons:

  • The contrast and brightness controls only offer three different gradations
  • The $299.95 price point will be out of range for many users, but it is commensurate with the video quality
  • Not suitable for eyeglass wearers though a prescription lens insert can be obtained for an additional cost from MyVu

Verdict:

  • I love it. I want one. Badly. It would have received five stars if the contrast and brightness control allowed for more precise fine-tuning.

Adobe Flash Player 10 to bring performance increase to Mac - Adobe\npreparing to put Flash on iPhone?

Sunday, July 6th, 2008 88 views

iPhone Flash PlayerApple and Adobe have been at something of a crossroads for some time now. The clashing of these titans has resulted in Apple refusing to let Adobe bring Flash plug-in support to its iPhone Safari browser. But, that may all change in the near future.

First let's explore what Adobe's working on.

The new Adobe Flash Player 10 beta 2 pre-release is now available for those of you that just like living on the stability-edge. But, the real significance of the Flash Player 10 pre-release is that it's promised to bring a 3-fold performance increase to Mac OS X machines. Specifically, Adobe Player 10 runs the GUIMark benchmark 3 times faster than in its previous incarnation.

Now, how does that point toward Adobe bringing Flash support to the iPhone?

Well, Steve Jobs essentially barred Adobe from porting their "unacceptable" Flash Lite to the iPhone. And, the full desktop-version of Flash Player is just too bloated and slow to work with the iPhone's pared-down processor. So, Adobe has resorted to crafting its own iPhone-optimized Flash player with enough punch to satisfy Steve Jobs and svelte enough to run decently well on the iPhone.

Unfortunately, the iPhone has been locked down to exclude the use of Safari plug-ins and preventing third-party apps from running executable code.

Is Adobe tweaking its Flash Player to give Apple's Mac machines a performance boost in a bid to try and sway Jobs's stanve on allowing iPhone Safari plug-ins? We sure hope so. Steve Jobs isn't exactly known for his kind heart, but if he can find a way to cut Adobe some slack and allow a Flash plug-in for the iPhone, we'd be more than a little grateful. Perhaps there's some light at the end of the iPhone 2.1 OS firmware-tunnel?

[Via: MacRumors]


Related Articles at IntoMobile:


feeds.feedburner.com

Tags: blog, iphone, russia, gadget, community, mac, ipod, apple

Best iPod Offers

Best iLinks

Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe to My Feed


Enter your email address: